<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>World Political Blog &#187; China</title>
	<atom:link href="http://worldpoliticalblog.com/category/china/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://worldpoliticalblog.com</link>
	<description>World Political Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:09:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What does the Security Council do about the North Korean launch</title>
		<link>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2009/04/07/what-does-the-security-council-do-about-the-north-korean-launch/</link>
		<comments>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2009/04/07/what-does-the-security-council-do-about-the-north-korean-launch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 06:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rocket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldpoliticalblog.com/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By all projections, the North Korean attempt was to try to put a satellite into space (not a missile test as feared). However, it is also known that the North Koreans are using the same vehicle for both a rocket launch, and a missile launch (and that is one of the fundamental problems of space [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By all projections, the North Korean attempt was to try to put a satellite into space (not a missile test as feared). However, it is also known that the North Koreans are using the same vehicle for both a rocket launch, and a missile launch (and that is one of the fundamental problems of space technology &#8211; a lot of the technology has dual applications); and so if the rocket had been successful, then that would also have been a validation of a missile with supposedly sufficient range to reach parts of the United States. This is a scary prospect, since the North Koreans have been suspected of working to miniaturize their nuclear device so as to form it to be a warhead capable of fitting onto a missile. Further, the North Koreans have been caught in the past of collaborating with other countries on both missile and nuclear technology. The rocket overflew Japan, but then failed, and there was no payload launched into orbit. At some point in the future, if they are allowed to advance, the North Koreans will be able to make sufficient advances.<br />
Unfortunately the North Koreans have not been susceptible to much pressure in the past (with China and Russia, key pressure capable nations, not willing to apply the required amount of pressure). They are already under United Nations sanctions for the previous nuclear test of 2006, and that does not seem to have much effect on the North Koreans; so the US is now worried about how to stop further work in this regard. Military threats also do not work since the North Koreans are capable of causing huge damage to Seoul, and maybe parts of Japan <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/04/06/un.nkorea/" target="_blank">(link to article)</a>:</p>
<p><span id="more-173"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>
The five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council and Japan met Monday for a second closed-door session to hammer out a response to North Korea&#8217;s weekend rocket launch in defiance of international opposition. But, as happened on Sunday following a called emergency session, there was no official statement from the council. Security Council Resolution 1718 was unanimously adopted in 2006, imposing a series of economic and commercial sanctions on North Korea. The resolution called for Pyongyang to conduct no further nuclear tests and to suspend all activities related to its ballistic missile program, including launches.<br />
However, not all Security Council members are onboard with Japan and the West. Russia and China are pushing for a technical assessment of the rocket launch before further actions are undertaken.<br />
Earlier Monday, Russian Ambassador Vitaly Churkin said it was important to avoid an &#8220;emotional knee-jerk reaction because what we do need is common strategy and not losing sight of the goal &#8212; and this is the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>Russia and China are not fully behind the US and Japan in this area, partially because they do not quite like the concept of seeming to act to further the interests of the US. As a result, they will stick to the stand that if the North Koreans were seen to be launching a satellite, then there is no need to take any action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2009/04/07/what-does-the-security-council-do-about-the-north-korean-launch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China based computer ring got into computers worldwide</title>
		<link>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2009/03/30/china-based-computer-ring-got-into-computers-worldwide/</link>
		<comments>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2009/03/30/china-based-computer-ring-got-into-computers-worldwide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Break]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exploit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldpoliticalblog.com/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For the past several years, there has been an active discussion among researches about the impact that a sustained attack on the computer infrastructure of developed countries could achieve. With modern infrastructures such as electricity, water, transport, finance, etc all being controlled through computational technologies, there is a persisting fear that all of this infrastructure [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the past several years, there has been an active discussion among researches about the impact that a sustained attack on the computer infrastructure of developed countries could achieve. With modern infrastructures such as electricity, water, transport, finance, etc all being controlled through computational technologies, there is a persisting fear that all of this infrastructure is under threat from any clever band of cyber attackers. Modern military games incorporate threats by hackers who are affiliated to sovereign countries, and in many cases, it is claimed that developing the ability to bring down the computer networks of other countries is part of the game plan for offensive action. In the past, it has been feared that countries such as China and Russia have developed capabilities for offensive cyber-warfare.<br />
Consider this case where a computer network, based in China, and dubbed as the &#8216;GhostNet&#8217; by a team of Canadian researches turned up a huge network based on computers located in China; these computers were the initiators of hacking attempts that broke into computers all over the world; this probe was based on a need by the Dalai Lama office in India to ensure that its own computers were not infected <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10207172-83.html" target="_blank">(link to article)</a>:</p>
<p><span id="more-167"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>
In &#8220;Tracking GhostNet: Investigating a Cyber Espionage Network,&#8221; issued over the weekend, the Canadian researchers say that the GhostNet comprises 1,295 infected computers in 103 countries, almost one third of them being &#8220;high-value targets, including ministries of foreign affairs, embassies, international organizations, news media, and NGOs.&#8221;<br />
The breaches tended to stem from a so-called social-engineering exploit, in which targets in the Tibetan community were sent an e-mail that appeared to be from the address campaigns@freetibet.org and that carried an attached Word document titled &#8220;Translation of Freedom Movement ID Book for Tibetans in Exile&#8221;&#8211;and that Word document was infected with the malicious code. The University of Cambridge report, &#8220;The snooping dragon: social-malware surveillance of the Tibetan movement,&#8221; doesn&#8217;t refrain from charging that the Chinese government was directing malware attacks: &#8220;(I)t was a targeted surveillance attack designed to collect actionable intelligence for use by the police and security services of a repressive state, with potentially fatal consequences for those exposed.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>These incidents are also warnings to Governments about how their infrastructural systems are only as strong as their weakest links. One node in the system getting hacked can lead into other nodes also falling, and lead to a risk that the entire system is being compromised. In the current system, it was also found that the exploit had the powers to turn on the voice recording and the camera systems of the infected computer, leading to a spying of the proceedings happening in front of the computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2009/03/30/china-based-computer-ring-got-into-computers-worldwide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The tainted food scandal in China worsens</title>
		<link>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/11/01/the-tainted-food-scandal-in-china-worsens/</link>
		<comments>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/11/01/the-tainted-food-scandal-in-china-worsens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 10:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/11/01/the-tainted-food-scandal-in-china-worsens/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For many weeks now, China has been facing a huge bad press in terms of tainted milk. For quite some time now, many manufacturers in China have been trying to make additional profit by adding melamine to milk (with the same milk being used as baby milk, and as part of milk products such as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For many weeks now, China has been facing a huge bad press in terms of tainted milk. For quite some time now, many manufacturers in China have been trying to make additional profit by adding melamine to milk (with the same milk being used as baby milk, and as part of milk products such as ice cream, sweets, candies, etc). This caused deaths in China, and led to a large scale removal of such products from store shelves in countries around the globe, along with a lot of outrage. China responded as it does, by blaming foreign media for hurting Chinese interests by excessive coverage, as well as by arresting a whole host of people responsible. However, it still did not answer the fundamental questions that came out it with regard to manufacturers feeling that they had the freedom to add a substance such as melamine (used in plastics, and nowhere close to anything used in food grade items) without any kind of inspection (or maybe the inspectors were all bought off).</p>
<p><span id="more-137"></span><br />
Next, there were more damaging reports that this contamination was known earlier but was repressed by Chinese authorities to ensure that the Beijing Olympics were not disturbed (a truly diabolical choice, and possible only in a dictatorship such as China where the press cannot report on such things if the censors don&#8217;t pass it). However, this is not the end. Imagine the case where this melamine was also added to animal feed <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/10/31/asia/01china-update.php" target="_blank">(and China exports a large amount of animal products)</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Chinese regulators are widening their investigation into contaminated food amid growing signs that the toxic industrial chemical melamine has leached into the nation&#8217;s animal feed supplies, posing health risks to consumers. The announcement came after food safety tests earlier this week found that eggs produced in three different provinces in China were contaminated with melamine, which is blamed for causing kidney stones and renal failure in infants. The tests have led to recalls of eggs and consumer warnings.<br />
The cases are fueling global concerns about Chinese food. In Hong Kong, food safety officials announced this week that they would begin testing a wider variety of foods for melamine, including vegetables, flour and meat products. On the mainland, Shanghai and other cities are moving aggressively to test a wide variety of food products for melamine, including fish and livestock feed, according to the state-run news media, which has in recent days carried multiple reports on melamine in animal feed. In the United States, worried consumers frantically e-mailed one another on Thursday and Friday about the possibility of melamine-tainted Halloween treats following a spate of news reports that some candies and chocolates made in China or with ingredients sourced in China had tested positive for high levels of melamine or been destroyed in recent weeks as a cautionary measure.
</p></blockquote>
<p>In the spate of a worldwide slow down in economies, such scandals about food can cause immense problems for China&#8217;s reputation with it getting a reputation as a place where quality can be compromised. Given that this relates to food stuffs, consumers would be even more worried, and if this relates to food stuff that children need and consume, parents would rather not take the risk. There are already news reports about large scale culling of chicken after it was discovered that eggs were contaminated with melamine.<br />
In the past, China has already come under pressure to due to contamination / quality problems with children&#8217;s toys, pet food, seafood exports. In this particular case, a lot of the consumers are also perplexed as to what manner of manufacturer would contaminate food items with an industrial chemical, and there are increasing calls for greater restraint (in previous cases, politicians in the consuming countries have also got involved, with some bringing in the issue of Chinese products, that are contaminated, also causing the decimation of such manufacturing facilities in the respective countries).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/11/01/the-tainted-food-scandal-in-china-worsens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debate in the US over Muslims from Chinese Uighurs</title>
		<link>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/10/09/debate-in-the-us-over-muslims-from-chinese-uighurs/</link>
		<comments>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/10/09/debate-in-the-us-over-muslims-from-chinese-uighurs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 03:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/10/09/debate-in-the-us-over-muslims-from-chinese-uighurs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Guantanamo Bay prisoners and their detention is probably one of the most legally debated issues in the United States. Ever since the US action in Afghanistan in 2001, and the detention of terrorists and others from there, there has been a raging debate over their treatment. On the one hand there is the need [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Guantanamo Bay prisoners and their detention is probably one of the most legally debated issues in the United States. Ever since the US action in Afghanistan in 2001, and the detention of terrorists and others from there, there has been a raging debate over their treatment. On the one hand there is the need to prevent the release of people (some of the detainees) who everybody knows are hard-core terrorists, who if released would go back to taking part in active operations against the United States and other countries. On the other hand, there is the need to ensure that all the detainees get their rights to a free trial, which is a due process of law, something that is a hallmark of a civilized society. There is no doubt that there will be some detainees who are innocent, or have committed minor crimes, and yet have been locked away for 7 years now.<br />
The case of the 17 Uighur Muslims from China&#8217;s Xinjiang suddenly jumped into the limelight this week when a single judge ordered that they be released and brought into the United States. Now, these are detainees whom the Administration is quite clearly not going to file a case against, and who if returned back to China will almost certainly land them in clear trouble. </p>
<p><span id="more-128"></span><br />
The United States has sent detainees back to different countries for legal processes in their countries, but given the history of China&#8217;s efforts against separatism in its Xinjiang province, there is a huge amount of belief that these detainees will be tortured if <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/10/09/america/NA-US-Guantanamo-Chinese-Detainees.php" target="_blank">they are sent to China</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>
A federal appeals court on Wednesday temporarily blocked a judge&#8217;s decision to immediately free 17 Chinese Muslims at Guantanamo Bay into the U.S. In a one-page order, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued the emergency stay at the request of the Bush administration. The three-judge panel said it would postpone release of the detainees for at least another week to give the government more time to make arguments in the case. The appeals court set a deadline of next Thursday for additional filings but it is up to the judges to decide how quickly to act afterward.<br />
Meanwhile, the Bush administration said it was continuing &#8220;heightened&#8221; efforts to find another country to accept the Uighurs, since the detainees might be tortured if they are turned over to China. &#8220;There are extensive efforts. We oppose the idea of their release here,&#8221; White House spokesman Tony Fratto said. The Justice Department criticized Urbina&#8217;s decision as undercutting immigration laws that dictate how foreigners should be brought into the country. It also cited security concerns over weapons training the Uighurs received at camps in Afghanistan. Such a potential security risk outweighs the inconvenience the detainees might suffer in waiting a while longer at Guantanamo, government lawyers contended.
</p></blockquote>
<p>In effect, since the detainees are not being accepted by any other country, and will not be sent to China, they have remained in prison for the last 4 years (after a determination that they can be released). The United States is also not willing to let them come into the country (from Guantanamo Bay where they are currently houses). A mighty complex issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/10/09/debate-in-the-us-over-muslims-from-chinese-uighurs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cadbury recalls chocolates over China tainted milk scandal</title>
		<link>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/09/29/cadbury-recalls-chocolates-over-china-tainted-milk-scandal/</link>
		<comments>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/09/29/cadbury-recalls-chocolates-over-china-tainted-milk-scandal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/09/29/cadbury-recalls-chocolates-over-china-tainted-milk-scandal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The growing &#8216;melamine&#8217; tainted milk scandal is taking on a more international hue. Earlier, projected to mostly impact only milk products made for babies in China, it is covering a whole lot of different products and countries. Categories such as powder, chocolates, candies, ice cream, etc are all getting affected, and recalls have been happening [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The growing &#8216;melamine&#8217; tainted milk scandal is taking on a more international hue. Earlier, projected to mostly impact only milk products made for babies in China, it is covering a whole lot of different products and countries. Categories such as powder, chocolates, candies, ice cream, etc are all getting affected, and recalls have been happening across the globe. Now, it seems that even a respected multi-national company such as Cadbury is getting affected, <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/09/29/asia/AS-Asia-Tainted-Milk.php" target="_blank">due to its products being manufactured in China</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
British chocolate maker Cadbury on Monday became the latest foreign company to be hit by China&#8217;s tainted milk scandal, ordering a recall of its Chinese-made products after saying tests &#8220;cast doubt&#8221; on their safety. Two U.S. food makers were meanwhile investigating Indonesian claims that high traces of the industrial chemical melamine had been found in Chinese-made Oreos, M&#038;Ms and Snickers, but stressed the same goods had tested negative in other Asian countries.</p>
<p><span id="more-123"></span><br />
U.S. companies Kraft Foods Inc. and Mars Inc. said they would adhere to a recall order of Chinese-made Oreo wafers, M&#038;Ms and Snickers in Indonesia, but said they wanted to conduct their own tests with outside experts. So far only a local agency has checked the products for melamine, but the levels found were considered very high.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Even now different companies are being strangely hesitant on taking actions that could impact their bottomline, after all, if these companies really cared for consumers, they would have carried out a voluntary inspection on their own and if their products carry melamine, withdraw them from the shelves. Instead, it seems that even though there is a high risk due to the milk products having been manufactured in China, the companies are hesitating in complying with Government orders to remove their products. They must be worried about the public perception if they carry out such a move, but it becomes far worse if they are seen to be dragging their feet in this respect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/09/29/cadbury-recalls-chocolates-over-china-tainted-milk-scandal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Melamine in milk reporting was delayed: China scandal</title>
		<link>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/09/26/melamine-in-milk-reporting-was-delayed-china-scandal/</link>
		<comments>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/09/26/melamine-in-milk-reporting-was-delayed-china-scandal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/09/26/melamine-in-milk-reporting-was-delayed-china-scandal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>China has been suffering from some serious bad press over an extended period due to low quality of some of its exports. This continued reporting of quality problems has started to affect the company&#8217;s reputation, and this latest report by the WHO over deliberate delays in reporting of the melamine in milk scandal would only [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China has been suffering from some serious bad press over an extended period due to low quality of some of its exports. This continued reporting of quality problems has started to affect the company&#8217;s reputation, and this latest report by the WHO over deliberate delays in reporting of the melamine in milk scandal would only aggravate issues. Given that the melamine content is far higher than the tolerable level, and was deliberately added to mislead testing about the protein levels, and that complaints about these issues were received as far ago as December of 2007, one can sense that at some point, the Chinese Government will suddenly start to take very harsh action (in the past, they have executed the head of an inspection agency for <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=aptCNK7hUe6c&#038;refer=home" target="_blank">some previous issue like this one)</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
China, embroiled in a tainted milk scandal that led to the deaths of four babies and sickened 53,000, suffered from a &#8220;deliberate failure&#8221; to report the contamination, the World Health Organization said today. &#8220;This incident was aggravated by delays in reporting at a number of sources,&#8221; Hans Troedsson, WHO&#8217;s China representative, told reporters in Beijing today. &#8220;These delays were probably a combination of ignorance and deliberate failure to report.&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="more-120"></span><br />
The melamine-milk crisis has revived concerns about Chinese food-safety controls after previous scares over seafood, dumplings and pet food. The European Union yesterday proposed banning some Chinese dairy products, joining restrictions in more than 20 countries and markets after 22 mainland companies were found to have sold contaminated products. &#8220;Controls in China need to be reinforced,&#8221; EU Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson said today in Beijing. &#8220;Above all, we expect responsibility from producers and managers in all companies involved in food production.&#8217;
</p></blockquote>
<p>This scandal is pushing beyond just milk, with products that use milk also getting affected. Chocolates, candies, yoghurt, ice cream, etc, are all under investigation in countries around the world. In some cases, melamine has been found in many of these products, and they have been pulled from the shelves. As a result, companies around the world have pulled China origin dairy products from stores in their countries, and many questions have been raised on the level of quality inspections in China. Coming soon after the Olympics gave a positive thumbs-up to China&#8217;s image, such a major scandal, that too affecting a food item, exposes the lack of quality control in the country&#8217;s industries, and has an immense potential to harm China&#8217;s exporting image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/09/26/melamine-in-milk-reporting-was-delayed-china-scandal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China and its milk scandal</title>
		<link>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/09/19/china-and-its-milk-scandal/</link>
		<comments>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/09/19/china-and-its-milk-scandal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/09/19/china-and-its-milk-scandal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For the last many years, China has been the leading supplier of a large range of goods to the world. Unfortunately, for the last few years, China has also been facing the brunt of massive quality problems. Seafood, paint, toys, toothpaste, and many other products have been found to be contaminated in one way or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the last many years, China has been the leading supplier of a large range of goods to the world. Unfortunately, for the last few years, China has also been facing the brunt of massive quality problems. Seafood, paint, toys, toothpaste, and many other products have been found to be contaminated in one way or the other. There have also been injuries and deaths due to these quality issues, with many different contaminants having been found. The latest one to emerge as a major scare is the problem about contamination of milk, causing milk from some of the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7624969.stm" target="_blank">largest producers being now evaluated</a>: </p>
<p><span id="more-113"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>
Shop shelves in China and elsewhere are being cleared of popular dairy products after tests found contamination in regular milk as well as baby formula. Inspectors found that 10% of liquid milk from three of China&#8217;s dairies was tainted with melamine.<br />
The scandal first came to light in milk powder that killed four infants and sickened more than 6,000 others. Suppliers are suspected of diluting milk to cut costs, then adding melamine to make it appear higher in protein. Melamine is an industrial chemical normally used in plastics, and is banned from food stuffs.
</p></blockquote>
<p>This is yet another problem over the quality levels of products made in China, and something that the Chinese Government would do well to repel with some fast action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/09/19/china-and-its-milk-scandal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hu affirms that Tibet will continue to be suppressed</title>
		<link>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/04/12/hu-affirms-that-tibet-will-continue-to-be-suppressed/</link>
		<comments>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/04/12/hu-affirms-that-tibet-will-continue-to-be-suppressed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tibet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/04/12/hu-affirms-that-tibet-will-continue-to-be-suppressed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Seems like a very obvious statement to make, given how China has reacted in the past. Ever since China took over Tibet in 1951, it has been extremely touchy about any external reaction on Tibet, dismissing all reaction as being an interference with its internal affairs. A lot of it is due to how China&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like a very obvious statement to make, given how China has reacted in the past. Ever since China took over Tibet in 1951, it has been extremely touchy about any external reaction on Tibet, dismissing all reaction as being an interference with its internal affairs. A lot of it is due to how China&#8217;s Communist politicians decipher any external reaction &#8211; any reaction from a politician outside China is seen as interference, not to be tolerated. The other part of the reaction is internal politics. China&#8217;s political system, with the politburo being at the peak of the political system, is in a system of constant tension. Any sign of relaxation, of letting things go out of control, or of letting people start to lead a protest, can lead to a weakening of the position of the President, and maybe slowly start his fall. The past history of Zhao Ziyang, who made the &#8216;mistake&#8217; of being sympathetic to student protesters in 1988, and was then overthrown and put under house arrest until his death in 2005 (17 years later). Even after death, there was no mourning allowed for him. This is the precedent that any China leader would want to avoid. Hu was the leader in charge of Tibet at the time of the last protest in 1988, and he was the one who made his name by suppressing the protest; and it was even more impressive politically for him because he did in a fairly ruthless manner. Read <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080412/wl_sthasia_afp/chinarightstibet_080412081935" target="_blank">what he said</a>: </p>
<p><span id="more-54"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>
Chinese President Hu Jintao Saturday defended the crackdown on protests in Tibet and denied the disturbances were linked to human rights in his first public comments on the incident. Hu told Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd the unrest was aimed purely at &#8220;splitting the motherland&#8221; and insisted Beijing&#8217;s handling of unrest was its own affair, according to state media.<br />
&#8220;It is a problem (of) either safeguarding national unification or splitting the motherland,&#8221; he said on the southern island of Hainan. &#8220;The Tibet problem is entirely an internal issue of China.&#8221; Exiled Tibetan leaders say Beijing&#8217;s suppression of the rare protests, which began last month, left about 150 dead. Hu, whose officials say only that Tibetan &#8220;rioters&#8221; left 20 dead, maintained the response was justified.
</p></blockquote>
<p>The steps that China has taken are typical; stop all reporting out of Tibet, prevent outsiders from reaching there; try to implement a total breakdown; blame Tibetans for the violence, and then claim that nobody outside has any right to say anything. And the sad truth is, China is now so powerful economically that nobody will be able to say what they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/04/12/hu-affirms-that-tibet-will-continue-to-be-suppressed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China up to its regular repression &#8211; this time in Tibet</title>
		<link>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/03/15/china-up-to-its-regular-repression-this-time-in-tibet/</link>
		<comments>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/03/15/china-up-to-its-regular-repression-this-time-in-tibet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/03/15/china-up-to-its-regular-repression-this-time-in-tibet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It is being reported that China is currently upto its usual practice of repression. Nobody can really forget the Tienanmen Square massacre of 1989 where China employed its soldiers and military machine to murder thousands of its own young citizens in cold blood. After that, China employed the same tactics against the practitioners of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is being reported that China is currently upto its usual practice of repression. Nobody can really forget the Tienanmen Square massacre of 1989 where China employed its soldiers and military machine to murder thousands of its own young citizens in cold blood. After that, China employed the same tactics against the practitioners of the Falun Gong sect (for some reason, seeing these members as being against the Communist party), and quite recently, China has been using its heavy-handed tactics to put down the frequent protests by the various rural citizens across the country (protesting against the repression, land-grab and corruption of the Communist Party). So, it would not surprise anyone if even the hint of a protest by Tibeteans leads to large-scale suppression. After all, China annexed Tibet in 1951, and ever since then, it is has been trying to assimilate Tibet through trying to put down Tibet&#8217;s culture, its leader (the Dalai Lama is a strict no-no for anybody trying to get into China&#8217;s good books), and by moving the main Han Chinese into Tibet. In the wake of all this, it is still surprising that Tibeteans even try to protest. Well, this is the week when a protest and the put-down by China have been making <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-fg-tibet15mar15,1,4282002.story" target="_blank">worldwide news</a>:</p>
<p><span id="more-52"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>
Tibet was hit by a fresh wave of violence Friday as protests by hundreds of Buddhist monks and other residents against Chinese rule resulted in burned shops, vandalized police vehicles and at least 10 deaths, government officials and witnesses said. American citizens in Lhasa, the capital of Tibet, reported rioting and gunfire, the U.S. Embassy in Beijing said in a warning to stay away from the city, which has seen several days of anti-Chinese protests.<br />
&#8220;There&#8217;s smoke and flames coming from the old city, but I can&#8217;t tell what&#8217;s going on since soldiers have surrounded the area,&#8221; said one Lhasa resident by telephone, who declined to be identified because of fear of repercussions. A tour guide surnamed Zhu, who wouldn&#8217;t give his first name, said there was a police and military crackdown underway, particularly in the area around Jokhang Temple. He said he could see dozens of military vehicles. Tibet is among the most tightly controlled areas in China. Protests first flared March 10, when monks took to the streets to mark the anniversary of a 1959 Tibetan uprising against Chinese rule. Communist Chinese troops seized control of Tibet in 1950.
</p></blockquote>
<p>China has enforced the regular tactics. There is a total cut-off of information flow with journalists no longer being allowed there; and of course, it is out of the question that people in the mainland will be able to see what is going on. The thing that has changed from previous times is the spread of information technology, and it is now a fight between the efforts of Chinese censors and the Government to implement control and the use of technology to get information out. In the short run, China will win. Western Governments are too tightly involved with the Chinese Government and its economy to raise much of a stink, but at some point, freedom will prevail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/03/15/china-up-to-its-regular-repression-this-time-in-tibet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More recalls of China made toys</title>
		<link>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2007/11/03/more-recalls-of-china-made-toys/</link>
		<comments>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2007/11/03/more-recalls-of-china-made-toys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 18:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2007/11/03/more-recalls-of-china-made-toys/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>China has suffered massively in terms of a loss of confidence and an almost sure public relations disaster; and by now, you would all be knowing what I am talking about &#8211; the frequent recall of toys and other goods made in China due to lead contamination, or other similar safety problems. Mattel Inc, a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China has suffered massively in terms of a loss of confidence and an almost sure public relations disaster; and by now, you would all be knowing what I am talking about &#8211; the frequent recall of toys and other goods made in China due to lead contamination, or other similar safety problems. Mattel Inc, a leading toy maker, has had multiple blows in terms of recall of many of its popular products, and this also has had a grievous impact on the revenues of the company. The greatest impact however has been on the mind of the anxious parent who is no longer sure which is the next toy being used by their kid which will turn out to be unsafe.<br />
Well, here&#8217;s <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003986683_recall01.html" target="_blank">another series of recalls</a>:</p>
<p><span id="more-44"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>
Hours before trick-or-treaters began going door to door, the government warned consumers Wednesday that fake Halloween teeth sold by the tens of thousands since last year contain excessive amounts of lead. The agency estimates that since January 2006, retailers have sold 43,000 eight-piece packages of the party favors.<br />
Also Wednesday, Toys &#8220;R&#8221; Us recalled about 16,000 Chinese-made Elite Operations toys because of lead contamination, the commission said. The recall included four Elite Operations toy sets: the Command Patrol Center, the Barracuda Helicopter, the Super Rigs set and a three-pack of 8-inch figures. No other Elite Operations toys are included in the recall. The toys were sold at Toys &#8220;R&#8221; Us stores and on toysrus.com between July and October.<br />
The commission also announced recalls of 380,000 Galaxy Warriors figurines and 1,500 SimplyFun Ribbit board games, both for lead-contaminated surface paints. The figurines were manufactured in China and distributed by Henry Gordy International. The board games were manufactured in China and imported and distributed by SimplyFun.
</p></blockquote>
<p>This is very scary; there is bound to be an overall suspicion about the quality of toys made in China, and the level of quality control. China has not helped matters by sometimes reacting angrily about the media focus on these recalls; such anger has no effect on the media, and does not improve the image in any way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2007/11/03/more-recalls-of-china-made-toys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

