<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>World Political Blog &#187; Family</title>
	<atom:link href="http://worldpoliticalblog.com/category/family/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://worldpoliticalblog.com</link>
	<description>World Political Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:09:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Girl forced to choose between parents and country</title>
		<link>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2009/04/17/175/</link>
		<comments>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2009/04/17/175/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Separation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldpoliticalblog.com/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In a reflection of how law does not take into account human factors, or emotions, a teenage girl was placed in the horrendous position of having to choose between the country where she was born, and her parents (whom she may not be able to physically meet for 5 more years). In a case in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a reflection of how law does not take into account human factors, or emotions, a teenage girl was placed in the horrendous position of having to choose between the country where she was born, and her parents (whom she may not be able to physically meet for 5 more years). In a case in Japan, a girl (Noriko Calderon), born to illegal immigrants, was given a choice of staying on in Japan, or returning on with her parents who were getting deported back to the Philippines. Her parents, Filipinos Arlan and Sarah Calderon, were illegal immigrants to Japan in the early 1990&#8242;s, who then married in Japan and settled down there, and Noriko was born in Japan, and lived there for all of her young life. She is for all purposes a Japanese citizen (but not legally so, being granted a one year visa that will need to be extended annually), speaking only Japanese, and getting educated in Japan&#8217;s schooling system.<br />
However, her life (and that of her parents) was totally turned upside down one day in 2006 when Noriko&#8217;s mother (Sarah Calderon) was arrested by authorities and accused of being an illegal immigrant. Her parents fought the legal battle till the end, but Japan is very strict about immigration controls and Noriko&#8217;s parents lost in the end, finally being deported. And the decision for Noriko was hers to take (stay or go with her parents) <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/04/13/japan.philippines.calderon/index.html#cnnSTCText" target="_blank">(link to article)</a>:</p>
<p><span id="more-175"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>
Arlan found a stable job working for a construction company. Noriko grew up Japanese, attending school and never learning her parents&#8217; native language. Noriko, like many Tokyo girls her age, loves hip-hop and hopes to be a dancer or a teacher at a dance school someday. But her future in the only country she&#8217;s ever known went into limbo when Japanese immigration authorities arrested her mother in 2006.<br />
Japan&#8217;s Immigration Bureau in a statement to CNN said the couple&#8217;s illegal presence in the country as an &#8220;extremely malicious&#8221; violation that &#8220;shakes the foundation of Japan&#8217;s immigration control.&#8221; But when it came to 13 year old Noriko, the government gave the girl a choice: Her country or her parents.  &#8220;Japan is my homeland,&#8221; says Noriko, when asked why she is choosing to stay behind. She will move in with an aunt, allowed to stay in Japan under a visa that the government will reassess yearly. Her life, say her parents, will be better in Japan. She&#8217;ll have schooling and the dreams a big city like Tokyo can offer her, versus the impoverished farm community her parents will move back to in the Philippines.
</p></blockquote>
<p>However heart-breaking the story, this is not a story that happens rarely. Such scenes are repeated in Japan and many other countries on a regular basis. Some countries are more liberal, allowing people to see a path for becoming citizens when they have been in the country for a long time; in other cases, it is equally traumatic when the child gets automatic citizenship due to having been born there, while the parents get no such benefit and are deported back to their original countries.<br />
One slight twist happens in some such cases when the families do not retain any papers of their original country&#8217;s citizenship, and their original country refuses to take them, asking for proof that these people were indeed their citizens in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2009/04/17/175/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texas appellate court decision on children to be appealed</title>
		<link>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/05/25/texas-appellate-court-decision-on-children-to-be-appealed/</link>
		<comments>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/05/25/texas-appellate-court-decision-on-children-to-be-appealed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 09:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/05/25/texas-appellate-court-decision-on-children-to-be-appealed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In a decision that shocked the Texas State Government, an appellate court decision on the 22dn of May 2008 threw out the Government action in taking away children from their mothers in the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints case, whereby the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services had raided the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a decision that shocked the Texas State Government, an appellate court decision on the 22dn of May 2008 threw out the Government action in taking away children from their mothers in the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints case, whereby the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services had raided the gated compound of the Church (a known polygamist compound where there have been many cases of girls being married off when they were under-age and forced to have sex with their elder husbands) and taken away around more than 400 children from their mothers, giving a reason of their being in constant danger of being forced to marry and have relationships when they are under-age.<br />
So, while this taking of children was being discussed in a somewhat chaotic lower court, an appellate court stepped in (in response to petitions from the mothers) and stopped proceedings in the trial court and ordered the return of children of the 38 mothers who had filed the suit. The decision by the appellate court was a severe indictment of the action of the state, essentially stating that the children were not in the peril that the state claimed; further, continuing news reports of this whole incident pointed out several problems &#8211; the state was not able to find the person who supposedly made the complainant, many of the people who were claimed to be underage were actually adult, and so on. </p>
<p><span id="more-70"></span><br />
However, now the state is going to file a petition in the Texas Supreme Court asking for <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-polygamy24-2008may24,0,4452061.story" target="_blank">this decision to be over-turned</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Texas authorities asked the state Supreme Court on Friday to overturn a ruling that found child welfare officials had no right to take more than 400 children from a gated polygamist compound. Lawyers for the Department of Family and Protective Services also requested that the high court allow the state to keep the children in foster homes until their fate is decided. Otherwise, they said, Texas would be forced within days to return more than 120 boys and girls to sect members who have not proved they are the biological parents.<br />
Texas authorities raided the Yearning for Zion Ranch in West Texas on April 3, after a caller claimed she was a 16-year-old bride suffering abuse at the hands of her husband, a call that since has been shown to probably be a hoax. Inside the secluded compound, child welfare officials have said, they found numerous pregnant teenagers and child brides living in a communal setting with older men, bound in &#8220;spiritual marriages.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>No matter what happens, this is likely to remain controversial. It is pretty much known that the Church&#8217;s compound had a continuing practise of polygamy (which remains illegal), and in earlier depositions, women who have escaped from the Church have claimed that they have been forced into marriage and sex. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/05/25/texas-appellate-court-decision-on-children-to-be-appealed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

