<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>World Political Blog &#187; Tension</title>
	<atom:link href="http://worldpoliticalblog.com/category/tension/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://worldpoliticalblog.com</link>
	<description>World Political Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:09:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is Mosque a Symbol of Jihad – the problem in New York ..</title>
		<link>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2010/08/19/is-mosque-a-symbol-of-jihad-%e2%80%93-the-problem-in-new-york/</link>
		<comments>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2010/08/19/is-mosque-a-symbol-of-jihad-%e2%80%93-the-problem-in-new-york/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Controversy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mosque]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldpoliticalblog.com/?p=269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The United States has never been more divided on any issue in recent past that this issue. The issue that has brought up this situation is the building of a Mosque near the September 11 site. It is not exactly a mosque but a community building which will include a mosque, sports facilities, theater, restaurant [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States has never been more divided on any issue in recent past that this issue. The issue that has brought up this situation is the building of a Mosque near the September 11 site. It is not exactly a mosque but a community building which will include a mosque, sports facilities, theater, restaurant and possibly a day care, and would be open to all visitors. The community center will be called Cordoba House and will approximately cost USD 100 million. The site on which the proposed community center is currently occupied by the 152 year old Burlington building and was also struck by a piece of one of the hijacked planes. The building has been used in a variety of ways from manufacturing to retail stores and currently serves as a makeshift Muslim prayer center.<br />
Even US president Barrack Obama who initially backed the plan of building a Muslim community center had to change his stance. Later Obama changed his loyalties by saying that he would not like to comment on the wisdom of making the decision to put a mosque there. A New York community board already gave a green signal for the construction of the building in May. In a desperate attempt to stop this building a request had been raised to the New York Landmarks Preservation Commission to grant landmark status to the building currently on site. The request was later discarded by a rather unanimous decision. The opponents of the building raise question about the source of the funding of the project and also about the connections of the father of the main proponent of the mosque Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf with radical group Muslim Brotherhood. Some people say that it would be humiliating that you build a shrine to the very ideology that inspired attacks on 9/11. People are also of the view that even if the building is built it will be a permanent sore point and a lighting rod for anti-Muslim feelings. Socially liberal Muslims are even urging Imam Feisal to abandon the project.<br />
<span id="more-269"></span><br />
Now, the big question is: Is building a Mosque near ground Zero in any way going to support the 9/11 attacks? The answer is a candid NO. Muslims have a right to practice their religion as anyone else in the US. That includes a right to build a place of worship and a community center on a private property in lower Manhattan. Imam Feisal’s might have had dubious relations with Muslim radical groups but the general opinion about him is that of a progressive leader. Why not put it this way. Let this building be a message to the entire world that US has a big heart and it does not hold all the Muslims of the world responsible for 9/11. 9/11 was a misdeed of a few radical Muslims and every Muslim can’t be humiliated because of that. Why not give a message to the world that US can forgive wrong doers and can very well distinguish between the wrong doers and people who have no connection with the attacks after all A Mosque is not a symbol of jihad! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2010/08/19/is-mosque-a-symbol-of-jihad-%e2%80%93-the-problem-in-new-york/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iran nuclear issue: Inspection by the UN of the new complex</title>
		<link>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2009/10/04/iran-nuclear-issue-inspection-by-the-un-of-the-new-complex/</link>
		<comments>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2009/10/04/iran-nuclear-issue-inspection-by-the-un-of-the-new-complex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 14:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enrichment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IAEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldpoliticalblog.com/?p=234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The most complex problem in international politics today is with respect to Iran. And in this, the situation is not even about the recent elections, or the divided political powers in Iran; it is about the Iranian nuclear program. Iran has consistently maintained that it has a peaceful nuclear program, and this is allowed by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most complex problem in international politics today is with respect to Iran. And in this, the situation is not even about the recent elections, or the divided political powers in Iran; it is about the Iranian nuclear program. Iran has consistently maintained that it has a peaceful nuclear program, and this is allowed by the NPT and by the safe-guards under it. Most of the world believes that this is a cover, and the real intention of the Iranians is to bluster and negotiate while moving to a real nuclear weapons capability. Further complicating details is that the nuclear program is a nationalistic program in Iran, which sees the Israelis as having a very powerful local presence, based on their nuclear devices. In addition, there are 2 more nuclear capable states in the locality &#8211; India and Pakistan. All 3 nuclear states have got off pretty easily, and so has North Korea, and so Iran feels that it can build one. The Iranian nuclear program is under the control of the Supreme Leader, the cleric Ayatollah Khameini, and also under the control of the conservative President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.<br />
For many years now, there has been a concerted effort by the western powers, France, Britain, Germany, and the US about how to control and rollback the Iranian effort, but going the sanctions route with the UN Security Council supporting the sanctions is not easy, since Russia and China both have stakes in Iran, and are resisting efforts to have tougher sanctions.</p>
<p><span id="more-234"></span><br />
There are also a lot of games being played in the background, with the western countries having spy rings inside Iran, and one of these spy rings detected the presence of another Iranian secret nuclear enrichment facility near the holy city of Qom. This detection forced the Iranians to announce the presence of this nuclear facility in a letter to the IAEA, and there are complex legalities about whether having a secret facility like this was proper or not (Iran claimed that it only had to announce once it reached a certain stage of activity). This announcement however raised more suspicions about the motives of the Iranians, and whether there were more such facilities that were hidden in the country. The Western countries are also racing against another unstated deadline, possible Israeli activity. Israel sees Iran as a deadly enemy, and may act militarily to destroy the Iranian facilities, something that would dramatically escalate tensions. Other powers in the area, such as Saudi Arabia would also be uncomfortable if Iran went ahead and built a bomb <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/10/04/iran.nuclear/index.html" target="_blank">(link to article)</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
ElBaradei urged Iran to submit to more comprehensive inspections because its nuclear program is so advanced. &#8220;It would help the agency to have Iran subscribing again to our regulations that allow us to be informed of the construction of nuclear facilities as early as possible,&#8221; he said. He also pressed Iran to give the IAEA &#8220;the authority for more information, for access to more locations that would enable the agency to provide assurances not only about declared nuclear activity in Iran but also about possible undeclared activities.&#8221;<br />
Iran&#8217;s top nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili met with William J. Burns, the U.S. undersecretary of state for political affairs, a senior U.S. official and a diplomatic source confirmed to CNN. The men discussed Iran&#8217;s nuclear program, a sit-down described as the first face-to-face meeting between the U.S. and Iran over the program. International powers want inspectors to have free access to Iran&#8217;s new facility and have threatened more sanctions if the Islamic republic doesn&#8217;t change its ways.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2009/10/04/iran-nuclear-issue-inspection-by-the-un-of-the-new-complex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Korean satellite / rocket launch</title>
		<link>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2009/04/04/north-korean-satellite-rocket-launch/</link>
		<comments>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2009/04/04/north-korean-satellite-rocket-launch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 17:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rocket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dear Leader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Jong Il]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldpoliticalblog.com/?p=171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Pakistan has been in the news for a long time of having made a game of getting money from the US to handle its home-grown terrorist problem; after all, these are terrorists that the Pakistani state is valiantly fighting against and they need money to compensate for this. A classic case of gamesmanship whereby you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pakistan has been in the news for a long time of having made a game of getting money from the US to handle its home-grown terrorist problem; after all, these are terrorists that the Pakistani state is valiantly fighting against and they need money to compensate for this. A classic case of gamesmanship whereby you get money else bad things may happen. Well, a state that has perfected this to a much higher degree is North Korea. North Korea is a failed state on any parameter. The state is a basket case economically, with large sections of its population having to face starvation on a regular basis. The state runs on the whims of the Dear Leader, Kim Jong Il, who has cultivated the image of a maverick, all the better to seem threatening to the world community.<br />
Why does North Korea matter ? If it was located in some corner of Africa, it would not have mattered so much. Unfortunately, North Korea has one primary industry and export, that is of armaments. It exports missiles to many countries (even though these missiles are not as accurate, but they are still a threat). Further, it maintains a huge army that remains eyeball to eyeball with South Korea and US troops (and South Korea and North Korea are technically still not at peace with other even though the war between them ended more than 50 years back), and is in a position to threaten the South Korean capital, Seoul, in a matter of hours.</p>
<p><span id="more-171"></span><br />
A couple of years back, North Korea crossed one major line by exploding a nuclear bomb, and also launched a long range rocket that crossed over Japanese airspace, drastically increasing tensions in the region. After a gap, North Korea is at it again, threatening to launch a communications satellite. Why would this matter ? Because it is believed that this launch is actually the test of a new rocket that will overfly Japanese territory. Japan has threatened that it will shoot down any debris that seems to be coming towards Japan, increasing the tension level manifold <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/04/03/north.korea.rocket/" target="_blank">(link to article)</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
North Korea has completed preparations for launching what it says is &#8220;an experimental communications satellite,&#8221; the reclusive nation&#8217;s state news agency reported early Saturday. Western nations fear that North Korea plans a ballistic missile test rather than a satellite launch, but the administration&#8217;s special envoy to the Six-Party Talks, Stephen Bosworth, said it didn&#8217;t matter if the North Koreans were trying to put a satellite in space or testing a ballistic missile that could threaten Japan or the United States.<br />
The U.S. Navy is monitoring the expected launch with at least four ships in the region around the Korean Peninsula and northern Japan, according to U.S. military officials. The ships &#8212; three destroyers and one cruiser &#8212; are capable of tracking and shooting down ballistic missiles using powerful Aegis radar systems aboard each vessel.
</p></blockquote>
<p>The situation remains tricky, akin to dealing with a neighborhood bully who has bombs that can threaten the neighborhood. Even countries such as China and Russia have not been able to exert much influence; and Japan cannot politically easily accept a North Korean rocket to overfly its territory or have debris landing inside the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2009/04/04/north-korean-satellite-rocket-launch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

