<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>World Political Blog &#187; Women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://worldpoliticalblog.com/category/women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://worldpoliticalblog.com</link>
	<description>World Political Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:09:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Malaysian woman to be caned for alcohol drinking</title>
		<link>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2009/08/24/malaysian-woman-to-be-caned-for-alcohol-drinking/</link>
		<comments>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2009/08/24/malaysian-woman-to-be-caned-for-alcohol-drinking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malaysia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldpoliticalblog.com/?p=220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When people start getting out of control in terms of alcohol drinking, they head off to rehabitilation centers to break their habits. Others try to moderate their alcohol limits. However, in many Islamic countries, alcohol is firmly banned, and citizens are not allowed to consume alcohol. Even then, using corporal punishment to deter drinking is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When people start getting out of control in terms of alcohol drinking, they head off to rehabitilation centers to break their habits. Others try to moderate their alcohol limits. However, in many Islamic countries, alcohol is firmly banned, and citizens are not allowed to consume alcohol. Even then, using corporal punishment to deter drinking is another very different step in prevention of alcohol drinking. However, consider the weird situation where a citizen of a country is not allowed to drink while another citizen of the country can drink (difference based on the religion of the person), a woman could be caned for drinking, and the punishment is imposed by a religious court that is parallel to the civil judicial system, and the civil judicial system cannot interfere in this judgment <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/08/24/malaysia.model.caning/index.html" target="_blank">(link to article)</a>: </p>
<blockquote><p>A Malaysian model, who was set to become the first woman to be caned in the southeast Asian country for drinking beer in public, had her sentence postponed Monday until the end of the Islamic holy month of Ramadan. An Islamic, or sharia, court in Pahang had fined Kartika &#8212; a Muslim &#8212; $1,400 (5,000 Malaysian ringgit) and sentenced her to six strokes with a rattan cane for drinking at a hotel bar two years ago.</p>
<p><span id="more-220"></span><br />
The caning would have been carried out within seven days of that, making her the first woman to be caned in Malaysia under sharia law. The moderate Muslim country has a dual-track justice system, in which Islamic courts operate alongside civil courts. But the country&#8217;s civil system also cannot overrule a sharia court sentence.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Such a punishment, caning, for drinking alcohol, seems very harsh. Further, the fact that a country&#8217;s civil courts cannot over-rule a religious court seems even stranger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2009/08/24/malaysian-woman-to-be-caned-for-alcohol-drinking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law subjugates Shia women in Afghanistan</title>
		<link>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2009/08/18/law-subjugates-shia-women-in-afghanistan/</link>
		<comments>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2009/08/18/law-subjugates-shia-women-in-afghanistan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Man]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldpoliticalblog.com/?p=216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In April, there was wide-spread international condemnation when a legislation catering to the Shia sect in Afghanistan was passed. This legislation tilted the gender balance very strongly towards men, something not uncommon in Islamic countries. However, since Afghanistan was a place where troops from many nations were fighting the Taliban, and many of these troops [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In April, there was wide-spread international condemnation when a legislation catering to the Shia sect in Afghanistan was passed. This legislation tilted the gender balance very strongly towards men, something not uncommon in Islamic countries. However, since Afghanistan was a place where troops from many nations were fighting the Taliban, and many of these troops were losing their lives, there was more outrage. How could a country have such a law if the Government of the country was dependent on foreign aid and foreign support. At that time, the President of Afghanistan, Karzai, shook off the criticism by claiming that he had not read the legislation clearly before signing it, and he would take steps to revert. However, seems like nothing really happened after that <a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/news/world/uk/Sex-starved-Afghans-can-deny-food-to-wives-Report/articleshow/4897962.cms" target="_blank">(link to article)</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Afghanistan has enacted a new legislation empowering men of Shia sect of Islam to deny their wives food and sustenance if they refuse to obey their husbands&#8217; sexual demands, a media report said on Saturday. The new final draft of the legislation also grants guardianship of children exclusively to their fathers and grandfathers, and requires women to get permission from their husbands to work, The Guardian reported.</p>
<p><span id="more-216"></span><br />
According to the report, the new law has been backed by the hardline Shia cleric Ayatollah Mohseni, who is thought to have influence over the voting intentions of some Shias, who make up around 20 per cent of the population. Karzai has assiduously courted such minority leaders in the run up to next Thursday&#8217;s election, which is likely to be close, a poll indicated.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Given that the President is now contesting for re-election as the President of Afghanistan, and Shia votes will also be important, it is doubtful whether this legislation will be so easily reversed; would be so ironic that a state supported by the West enshrines a massive gender bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2009/08/18/law-subjugates-shia-women-in-afghanistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Afghan law that allowed rape in a marriage to be reviewed</title>
		<link>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2009/04/17/afghan-law-that-allowed-rape-in-a-marriage-to-be-reviewed/</link>
		<comments>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2009/04/17/afghan-law-that-allowed-rape-in-a-marriage-to-be-reviewed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldpoliticalblog.com/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Over a period of history, the concept of rights of a woman in marriage have been evolving; from earlier times where many cultures considered the woman to be a property of the husband in the marriage, most societies now legally consider the rights of both men and women in a marriage to be the same [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over a period of history, the concept of rights of a woman in marriage have been evolving; from earlier times where many cultures considered the woman to be a property of the husband in the marriage, most societies now legally consider the rights of both men and women in a marriage to be the same (of course, in realistic terms, this may not be always true, with many cultures believing men to be the superior, and having more rights). However, it is also true that many Islamic countries have a conflict between the rights of men and women in a marriage &#8211; there are a number of clerics who believe that woman do not have the same rights (with the Taliban-run Afghanistan being a society where the rights of woman were definitely much lower than that of men).<br />
Inter-linked in all this is the concept of sexual relations in marriage, and what are the duties / obligations of each partner in a marriage. Policies have slowly evolved that the concept of force has been recognized as not valid; if a partner forces the other partner to submit to a sexual relationship by force, then it is now recognized as rape. However, recent events in Afghanistan changed this entire understanding.</p>
<p><span id="more-180"></span><br />
Recently, a law was passed in Afghanistan for the minority Shia population that legalized rape within the marriage, allowing the husband to force the demand for sexual relationship within the marriage. The passage of this law outraged people all over, with women&#8217;s rights groups in Afghanistan protesting the passage of the law; more significantly, western backers of the Karzai Government were outraged and gave public statements demanding withdrawal of the law. All this pressure has finally resulted in a statement by the Afghan President that the law will be revised and brought into conformance with the Afghan constitution and with the Sharia <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/04/16/afghanistan.law.karzai/index.html" target="_blank">(link to article)</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
#  Afghan law appears to let a man to have sex with his wife even when she says &#8220;no&#8221;<br />
# Karzai tells CNN he, others unaware of the provision due to the amount of legislation<br />
 Karzai told CNN&#8217;s Fareed Zakaria that he and others were unaware of the provision in the legislation, which he said &#8220;has so many articles.&#8221; Karzai signed the measure into law last month. &#8220;Now I have instructed, in consultation with clergy of the country, that the law be revised and any article that is not in keeping with the Afghan constitution and Islamic Sharia must be removed from this law,&#8221; Karzai said.<br />
The bill languished in the country&#8217;s parliament for a year-and-a-half before it was recently pushed through in what one legislator called a &#8220;chaotic&#8221; vote. Women from various parts of Afghanistan marched in the capital Wednesday to protest the law, which has also been criticized by human-rights groups and Western leaders, including U.S. President Barack Obama.
</p></blockquote>
<p>For now, the measure has been beaten back, but measures to lift women&#8217;s rights will take time, and many reverses before they can take root, especially in a backward society such as in Afghanistan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2009/04/17/afghan-law-that-allowed-rape-in-a-marriage-to-be-reviewed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Horrible crime: 3 teenage girls + 2 other women buried alive for honor</title>
		<link>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/09/01/horrible-crime-3-teenage-girls-2-other-women-buried-alive-for-honor/</link>
		<comments>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/09/01/horrible-crime-3-teenage-girls-2-other-women-buried-alive-for-honor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 09:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/09/01/horrible-crime-3-teenage-girls-2-other-women-buried-alive-for-honor/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are some things that the free world takes so much for granted, that when you read about incidents such as the one that I am going to describe below, something cold and clammy catches you. Unfortunately, the incident below is related to the concept of &#8216;honor&#8217; killing, and is seen as acceptable (or at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some things that the free world takes so much for granted, that when you read about incidents such as the one that I am going to describe below, something cold and clammy catches you. Unfortunately, the incident below is related to the concept of &#8216;honor&#8217; killing, and is seen as acceptable (or at least something that is thought to be acceptable and practiced) in some cultures. A lot of these are in the countries of South and West Asia, where there is more or a tribal / clan culture, and typically in a society which is totally male dominated. So, what is honor killing ?<br />
From Wikipedia &#8211; &#8220;An honor killing or honour killing is generally the murder of a female member of a family by the family, when they (and maybe the wider community) believe her to have brought dishonor upon them. A woman can be targeted commonly for: refusing an arranged marriage, being the victim of a sexual assault, seeking a divorce—even from an abusive husband—or committing adultery or fornication. These killings result from the perception that defense of family honour justifies killing a woman whose behavior dishonours her family.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/sep/01/pakistan" target="_blank">Read a bit about the incident</a>:</p>
<p><span id="more-100"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>
Three teenage girls have been buried alive by their tribe in a remote part of Pakistan to punish them for attempting to choose their own husbands, in an &#8220;honour&#8221; killing case. After news of the deaths emerged, male politicians from their province, Baluchistan, defended the killings in parliament, claiming the practice was part of &#8220;our tribal custom&#8221;.<br />
The girls, thought to have been aged between 16 and 18, were kidnapped by a group of men from their Umrani tribe. They were driven to a rural area and then injured by being shot. Then, while still alive, they were dragged bleeding to a pit, where they were covered with earth and stones, according to the findings of Human Rights Watch, the international campaigning group. Officials, speaking off the record, confirmed the killings. Some reports said that two older relatives of the girls had tried to intervene, but they too were shot and buried with the girls while still alive.
</p></blockquote>
<p>This is an absolutely despicable act, and the fact that the Government refuses to take any action on this even 6 weeks after this cold-blooded murder (in Baba Kot, a remote village in Jafferabad) makes it even more horrible. The Pakistani Government as well as the Government of Baluchistan are both run by the Pakistan People&#8217;s Party, the party that was run by Benazir Bhutto for the last 2 decades before her assassination, and the refusal to get the people involved arrested (for fear of antagonizing the tribes involved) is a political act. Even Musharraf was better than this, since in a major honor case (where a girl was raped as a means of punishment), he had got the people involved arrested and tried. In this case, what the girls wanted to do was to get married in a civil court, and this was enough to get them killed.<br />
Unfortunately, this sort of custom (should one dignify this sort of act by calling it a custom?) happens in other countries in the region as well to varying degrees &#8211; the denial of many rights such as being able to select their own partners, being arrested for meeting people of the other sex, harassed and arrested for not wearing a full length gown, and in the more extreme cases, being ordered to be killed by tribal / caste gatherings that assume the power of life and death. These need to be combated through more education, bringing in more development; at the same time, they need to be accompanied by swift and merciless punishment for the people involved. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://worldpoliticalblog.com/2008/09/01/horrible-crime-3-teenage-girls-2-other-women-buried-alive-for-honor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

